***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on grassroots financial supporters to exist. If you appreciate what we do, please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter (even just $5/month would go a long way in sustaining us!) We also offer advertising options for advocacy groups, events and businesses! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News Media” — this is YOUR chance to do something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250 Thank you so much for your support and please invite your friends and family to like us on Facebook, sign up for our email newsletter and visit our website!***

Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), longtime champions for Iowa’s farmers and renewable fuel industry, today voted against Mark Menezes, nominated to be Deputy Secretary of Energy.

“Given the uncertainty with the ‘gap year’ small refinery waivers, the wasted time and resources to score the waivers again, the lack of transparency in the entire process, and most importantly, the toll this has taken on Iowa’s farmers and biofuel producers, we could not in good faith support Mr. Menezes at this time,” Grassley and Ernst said.    

Following their opposition, the senators are continuing their push for greater transparency and certainty for Iowa’s farmers and producers, asking the Department of Energy (DOE) to provide the public with information on DOE’s score of each petition and when the score recommendation was transmitted back to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

“Since your last correspondence, we have learned of six more petitions for SREs that EPA has asked DOE to score. Granting these petitions would increase the pain facing the biofuels industry and the rural communities that biofuels support. These petitions threaten to undercut the RFS and fail to meet the standard set by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision on the use of SREs,” Grassley and Ernst wrote.

“You stated in your response to us that you are reviewing petitions already reviewed by DOE. We are concerned DOE wasted valuable time and resources to score these petitions again…We also request that you provide the public with information on DOE’s score of each petition and when the score recommendation was transmitted back to EPA.”

Full text of the letter can be found HERE.

Author: Press Release