***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on the financial support of our readers to exist. Please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter at $5, $10/month - whatever you think we're worth! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News” — now YOU can actually DO something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250

A federal court in Texas struck down an Obama-era rule that forced doctors across the nation to perform “gender-transition surgeries” even if such procedures were against their medical judgment or religious beliefs.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor reversed a rule from the Obama administration that required doctors to perform “gender transition” procedures upon request on any patient, including a child, even if they had a religious objection or believed the procedure could harm the patient. Doctors who refused to violate their conscience would have faced penalties, including losing their jobs.

Judge O’Connor had issued a preliminary injunction at the end of 2016 against the enforcement of the rule in the case of Franciscan Alliance v. Azar, after doctors around the country filed suit against the mandate on religious freedom grounds. More than 19,000 health care professionals, nine states, and several religious organizations combined in two lawsuits against the mandate, saying that it unlawfully required doctors to, in cases of objection, violate their religious beliefs or the Hippocratic Oath to do no harm to the patient. The regulation stemmed from Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination in health care on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. HHS interpreted “sex discrimination” under this rule to include gender identity, thus mandating the provision of “gender-transition surgeries.”

In June 2019, the Office of Civil Rights issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking directly pertaining to Section 1557 and the sex discrimination issue. Just prior to that in May, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services finalized the Conscience Rule which is expected to go into effect next month.

The court concluded that the Obama-era rule violated the Administrative Procedures Act because it was contrary to the federal law known as Title IX, and it violated the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The court then vacated the Obama-era rule.

Liberty Counsel’s Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “This commonsense ruling is a major victory that ensures healthcare entities and professionals will not be bullied out of the healthcare field because they decline to violate their conscience. Medical professionals take an oath to ‘do no harm’ and that includes harmful procedures that violate their medical and moral judgment only to fulfill the agenda of activists,” said Staver.

Author: Liberty Counsel


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here