MUST-READ: Inside the Trans-Mania

***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on grassroots financial supporters to exist. If you appreciate what we do, please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter (even just $5/month would go a long way in sustaining us!) We also offer advertising options for advocacy groups, events and businesses! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News Media” — this is YOUR chance to do something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250 Thank you so much for your support and please invite your friends and family to like us on Facebook, sign up for our email newsletter and visit our website!***

Sex/Gender and its role in identity is a subject that I have studied for the past eighteen years, for the simple reason that it intersects with history, culture, technology, society, art, and psychology.  There is not an aspect of our reality that it does not touch.  As a millennial, I became aware of and rejected transgenderism relatively early on (hardly surprising considering “transamerica” came out when I was a teenager) especially after becoming aware of the existence of genetic hermaphroditism.

In 2019, Time Magazine published a survey by the self-styled Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation revealing “Young Americans Are Increasingly ‘Uncomfortable’ With LGBTQ Community, GLAAD Study Shows.”

The survey showed:

“that millennials and Gen-Z (adults in the 18-34 age bracket) are becoming increasingly ‘uncomfortable’ with at least some of the hypotheticals — the percentage of those surveyed who were ‘very or somewhat comfortable’ in all the scenario prompts dropped by eight points on average, from 53 to 45 percent. Of the groups surveyed, young people were the only demographic to see such a sharp decline in acceptance.”

This change in demographics should surprise no one.

Most of the push for LGBTQ+ came from older generations who had less exposure or direct contact with that population.  For self-righteous liberals, protesting in favor of a population (whose existence was heavily romanticized) fed their need to view themselves as champions of civil rights in the vein of Martin Luther King Jr. and Alice Paul.

But Millennials and Gen Z were raised from an early age with a very different set of social values that preclude the possibility of accepting Trans-Mania.  One example being 1990s Sesame Street sketch “Perfect as a Pig” that taught kids the polar opposite of transgenderism.

Yet this year, Iowa 3rd District Congresswoman Cynthia Axne proudly voted and praised the U.S. House of Representatives passage of the “Equality Act.”

Ahead of the 2022 Congressional Elections and the 2024 Iowa Caucuses, Iowa’s Millennial and Gen Z voters should ask themselves important questions.

Question:  Should a hypochondriac identifying as a cancer patient be allowed to undergo chemo-therapy and surgical removal of healthy tissue, attend support groups to discuss their feelings as a “Cancer survivor” and be allowed to alter their medical records and be awarded disability status as a form of treatment for body dysmorphia? 

This, unfortunately, is also not a hypothetical question as this has started becoming a common (though not yet socially accepted) trend.

In one widespread case a woman, named by Elle Magazine as “The Most Inspiring Woman You’ve Met This Year” launched apps, blogs, etc . . . a few years later revealed it had all been a lie from start to finish:

“No. None of it’s true. I am still jumping between what I think I know and what is reality. I have lived it and I’m not really there yet.”

The medical condition is known as Munchausen Syndrome.

It is also the rationale used to justify transgenderism despite their symptoms being entirely psychiatric and in the absence of an actual genetic/biological medical condition such as hermaphroditism.

It’s also what Representative Axne voted for.

Better Question: A woman bleeding from her vagina as part of her monthly menstruation and a man who identifies as being a woman is trying to simulate a period by smearing food coloring blood imitation so he can pretend to be a woman.  Both go to the store and there is only one tampon left – who should get it? 

For those of us who are sane the answer is a no-brainer, but According to the LGBTQ+ Movement, both have an equal claim to it and menstruation is not an exclusively female experience.

It’s also what Representative Axne vote for.

Best Question: What’s the difference between a man exposing his penis and testicles to a group of naked women (including minors) in a female-changing area and a man who claims he’s a woman exposing his penis and testicles to a group of naked women (including minors ) in a female-changing area?

Answer: Not a damn thing.

But that’s what the LGBTQ+ movement is pushing, backed up with violence committed by their own Trans-Klan and legitimized by their allies in the media and propaganda organizations like GLAAD.

Again, It’s also what Representative Axne vote for.

Wi Spa

On July 24, 2021, a woman was outraged to discover that a man was allowed entrance to the female-changing areas at Wi Spa (a Korean Spa in Los Angeles) and expose his penis and testicles to the female clientele.

Having been to Wi Spa myself (albeit several years ago) to enter the spa clientele go through either the male or female changing areas.  Here there are communal showers, hot tub, etc . . . . where everyone walks around naked and then changes into clothing provided by the spa to enter the gender-integrated areas (such as the heated sauna rooms or the restaurant).  Families frequently attend together and children are regularly at the spa.

When female customers reported his presence to Wi Spa staff, they were informed that he had a legal right to be there under California law.

The result was that CubanaAngel (link as the woman has become known, organized a peaceful protest at the spa on July 3 and July 17.  At both protests, peaceful protestors were attacked by the Antifa Trans-Klan, showing up with a variety of weapons, including pepper spray, stun guns, and knives.

The Trans-Klan media outlets immediately began pushing propaganda in what has become their standard mode of operating – Legitimize the harm they’ve done and then deny any harm occurred while blaming the real victims. owned Washington Post featured a series of quotes from individuals that started with a sneering headline:

“A trans woman reportedly undressed in a spa.  Customers said they were ’traumatized,’ and a protest ensued.”

Apparently ‘lived experiences’ – the favorite catchphrase of every Left-Wing social activist – only matter when they are carefully developed and orchestrated by LGTBQ+ activists and latched onto by Media Allies.  But The Washington Post took it a step further by actually attempting to blame the women themselves for going to the Spa in the first place quoting an Ohio member of the Trans-Klan Klansmember:

“Women-only spaces should be protected,” said Zac Boyer, manager of programs and outreach for the central Ohio-based LGBTQ organization Stonewall Columbus, but that doesn’t mean all women have the same genitals.

“If you don’t want your child to see a variety of bodies, don’t take them to naked spaces,” Boyer said.”

Yes, a sexual predator targets you and you’re at fault.

More to the point, this psychotic statement comes from an organization that is funded by 365 Corporate Sponsors including KrogerUS Bank  Big Lots  Bud Light  Chase  AARP Ohio  Key BankWhite Castle etc . . .

This attitude is also not a single individual’s opinion.

In 2019, Debra Messing apologized to the Trans-Klan for assuming that women have vaginas:

“The porn industry has perpetuated this myth of what a ‘beautiful’ vagina looks like and as a result there are women who feel shame or insecure about the shape of the vulva,” she continued. “I loved that this picture said ‘every single one is beautiful and unique and that’s powerful.’ I did not, however, think ‘but there are innumerable beautiful, unique and powerful women who don’t have a vagina.’ And I SHOULD have. And for that I am so so sorry.”

The online reaction was outrage with people taking to social media, Yelp and Google Reviews (all of which were suppressed by those platforms) to denounce Wi Spa.

Having not gotten the response they expected, Trans-Klan media outlets then began circulating the rumor that it was a staged hoax. An Anonymous author writing in The Los Angeles Blade (self-billed as “The only LGBTQ News Source in the White House”) ran an article claiming:

“Alleged Trans incident at upscale LA Spa may have been staged.” 

The article presented no evidence, no official statements and cited supposed anonymous sources at LAPD and Wi Spa, and was written ahead of the second protest for the purpose of pressuring LAPD to suppress Women’s Rights protestors that they label “Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists.”

Multiple other media outlets then picked it up and began reporting on this report as though it were fact.  The article however contained misinformation stating:

“Similarly, a source at the Spa told the Blade there’s no record of any of its usual transgender clients on its appointments guest list on the day in question. Treatment at the Spa is by appointment only, and most of its transgender clients are well known to the staff.”

That isn’t true – clients have the option of booking appointments and receiving free spa access or just paying for the spa access itself.  Secondly, whether any trans-client booked an appointment that day is irrelevant.  The Wi Spa employee in the video and on duty at the time of the incident confirmed there was a man in the women’s section and that he had a right to be there under California law.

Since then, according to Los Angeles Magazine five women have now filed police reports with LAPD for indecent exposure at Wi Spa.  Further according to Los Angeles Magazine – the Los Angeles Blade published their report a day AFTER the first police report was filed.

Trans-Klan media then began blaming both the woman for having the audacity to have a lived experience that didn’t conform to their activist narrative, rather than the man that caused the issue in the first place.  They also claimed that “Cis-Gendered men” were going into places to create trouble.

But that is the point.  Even assuming that someone believes in Cis-Gender or Trans-Gender males (I don’t) – the impact on those surrounding them is still the same, especially as the LGBTQ+ has now declared that a Trans-Gender Woman can also be a lesbian (a man who identifies as a woman but wants to have sex with women).

This incident is only one particularly obscene public incident of Trans-Sourced Assaults (TSA’s).

J.K. Rowling 

Last year J.K. Rowling stood up to the Trans-mob.  She penned a thoughtful and detailed essay on her perspective – she didn’t have to, but she did.  The result was some hate mail (although Rowling has revealed 90% of those who wrote her agreed with her) and worse Trans-Klansmen Tweeting pornography at a Children’s art thread she had on Twitter.  Recently a Twitter user upped the ante by attempting to incite fellow Klans-members to send her pipe bombs.  Rowling not only called them out but also sarcastically commented:

“Yes, but now hundreds of trans activists have threatened to beat, rape, assassinate and bomb me I’ve realized that this movement poses no risk to women whatsoever.”

The Media reaction to this was incredible and disturbing:

Vanity Fair:   Katherine Waterston (a star in the Fantastic Beasts franchise Rowling created) like most of the Harry Potter cast spoke out – to condemn Rowling, not the murder or rape threats against her.

The Mary Sue:   J.K. Rowling is SO CLOSE to Getting the Harm She’s Caused If She’d Only Connect the Dots

Vogue:  J.K. Rowling’s Transphobia is Unacceptable– But So Is Her Online Harassment

The mentality of the Trans-Klan and their allies towards Rowling is no different than the KKK and white supremacist attitude towards Emmet Till  – his murder was bad, but so was his whistling at a white woman.  Anyone who thinks that’s too strong an analogy should take stock of the fact that Rowling has been threatened with rape and murder, had JK Rowling only been a modestly successful author and made these statements unable to afford protection for herself and her family, she might very well be dead right now.

Considering that reporter Andy Ngo has been reporting on this violent group for several years was targeted for murder by these linch-happy would-be murderers.  Ngo has been forced to relocate outside the United States for his safety.

Several years ago on the Dr. Drew Show,  female impersonator “Zoey Tur” placed his hands on Conservative Commentator Ben Shapiro and threatened to hospitalize him, while several other guests verbally attacked Shapiro for not acknowledging “Tur” as a woman.  As a side note – the producers orchestrated a five to one panel and specifically invited an Orthodox Jew as the only person to disagree, despite the fact that there is no shortage of commentators that could have had they been invited.  They were not.  Feminists, Black Christians, Evangelical Christians or any other commentator whose mistreatment might spark outrage or break the facade of an intolerant religious fanatic were brought on to participate.  Instead, five commentators took turns attacking an Orthodox Jew.

Will J.K. Rowling (or someone else) have to end up dead with a grieving family and her beaten, raped and mangled body shown on international television before the Trans-Klan, and their allies face a reckoning?


The most common propaganda talking point is to paint “Trans-Women” as victims and martyrs.  Men claiming to be women are more likely to commit crimes, specifically sexually assaulted offenses.

In the United Kingdom, 18% of the total prison population are incarcerated for sexual offenses.

However, in terms of the male prison population claiming to identify as women more than half are sex offenders.

This shouldn’t surprise anyone remotely familiar with less publicized incidents of Trans-Sourced Assaults and Violence.

In January 2017, a female impersonator in Australia attacked multiple individuals with an ax intending on murdering them.  The sentencing judge was more lenient and failed to impose a sentence that reflected the criminality of his crime due to “gender dysphoria and associated mental health difficulties including depression.”

In the United Kingdom, a female impersonator who was a convicted pedophile who also had been previously convicted of “grievous bodily harm, burglary, multiple rapes and other sexual offices as women” was housed in a women’s prison.  There he sexually assaulted two other inmates.  It also wasn’t the only incident.

In California, multiple female inmates have begun reporting being sexually assaulted.

More recently, a female impersonator targeted and lured Eric Aguillion of Houston, Texas on a dating app “MeetMe” to his home for sex.  According to Aguillion’s attorneys, the female impersonator did not disclose that he was a man and had not even undergone any surgical operations.  When Aguillion attempted to leave, the female impersonator got physical with him and blocked the doorway and Aguillion shot him in self-defense.

Strangely enough, Trans-Klan media outlet The Advocate went as far as describing it this way:

“Aguillon met the woman, whose name has not been released, on a dating app. At her apartment in southwest Houston, the morning of May 7, she told him she was transgender after they had engaged in sexual activity. He then shot her in the chest, according to court documents obtained by local media.”

In other words – this man impersonating a woman committed a homosexual sexual assault on another man and The Advocate is okay with it.  Worse the news media has spread the real victim’s name and image all over while concealing his assailant’s identity allowing him to do it again.  This however isn’t surprising to anyone – after all in the United Kingdom, the Trans-Klan is actively proclaiming the right to deceive sex partners and lure them into non-consensual sexual relations as a human right.

This position has been further championed by LGBTQ Nation proclaiming the right to deceive a sex partner into relations that they would not knowingly consent or voluntarily participate in otherwise

In 2018, a female impersonator in the United Kingdom demanded to have two criminal convictions removed from his permanent record arguing”

“I do not wish my gender history to be more widely known and do not wish to disclose my trans status to employers,”

The article also points out that “A right to removal, if established, could cover rape, another crime that can legally be committed only by a person with a penis.”

This essentially says it all.

The entire basis of the Transgender Psyche is narcissism and psychosis. In the Transgender world, a man (or woman) who impersonates the opposite sex should be forced to disclose criminal history to employers or face consequences for their actions (such as being registered as a sex offender) depends on how the perpetrator feels about their actions, not about how their impact on their victims.

This attitude is pervasive throughout the organized LGBTQ+ Movement.  In 2019, the Houston Public Library began hosting “Drag Queen Story Hour” for kids and allowed a Registered Child Sex Offender to participate   When activists groups began demanding more information they were ignored by the City of Houston until they did their own digging and went to the media.  When caught it came out they had not even done a background check as required by their own policies.

This wasn’t a one-off either, the sex offender volunteered three times.  Houston Public Library Director, Dr. Rhea Brett Lawson was quoted as stating:

“We get a list of names by the group that we get our readers from, and his name was not on the list,” said Lawson. “So we could not do a background check.”

The system admitted on Friday that it did not conduct a background check on Garza as policy dictates. We’ve learned that part of the issue was that Garza listed his name as Nicky Salazar when volunteering, and didn’t provide a birth date or social security number.”

But in their official reaction, the organizers of the Houston Drag Queen Story Hour responded by playing the victim and trivializing what happened:

“Then, last Friday, the ball dropped. News broke that one of our former readers was a sex offender. She was part of storytime before HPL started enforcing background checks for every performer, and hasn’t been back since they started. When Trent spoke to the queen in question this weekend, she confirmed that she had been convicted in 2009. It was devastating. We had insisted and insisted that what we were doing was safe for children, and yet here was a performer who had been charged with sexual assault of a minor. We didn’t know about the conviction prior to last week, but it would have come up if a background check had been conducted. It was a systematic mistake.

Everyone who has performed since October—including ourselves—has undergone a background check and has clean records. It is frustrating that the past conviction of a single performer now undermines the efforts of three dozen other drag kings and queens who have delighted parents and children alike with songs, costumes, and most importantly, stories.

The most upsetting outcome is the hate Blackberri has faced because of the controversy. She has become the canvas onto which these right-wing pundits project their hatred and fear: an African American with a beard and a full face of makeup. has since misidentified her as the sex offender in question. It isn’t her fault. She has a clean record and is one of the most prolific drag performers in the city. She’s done nothing wrong. How could she have known, when we invited her to read a storybook to a handful of children, that it would evolve into death threats and national scorn? How could any of us?

We have tried so hard to take the high road, to not stoop to mud-slinging. We have patiently listened to the people that declared we were sexualizing and molesting children. We have asked counter-protesters to be peaceful or not show up at all. We have been calm. We have been collected. But we are angry. And we are tired. And we are sick of well-intentioned but misinformed news stories that have only polarized people more. And so we wanted you to hear it from us.

An organization (that could have easily done their own background check and chose not too) let a registered child sex offender participate multiple times – but its LGBTQ+ who are the victims!  Not the families or children who trusted them.  Not the taxpayers who fund the library.  Their response did not even include a condemnation of the registered sex offender who knew that he was prohibited from volunteering but whose actions were trivialized to one brief mention in a single paragraph of a lengthy letter!


The home and source of much of the Trans-Klan Online is, has been, and remains Twitter.  In 2019, Twitter began banning users who refused to go along with the Transgender mania.  Their CEO, Jack Dorsey, has been vocal about any policy opposed by the Trans-Klan while remaining silent about his Klansmen’s tweeting pornography at J.K. Rowling and sending her pipe bomb threats.  Dorsey has also instituted a policy to coerce users to use Transgender “preferred pronouns” and fake identities or else face being banned.

This however is not the only policy Jack Dorsey has taken.  For those who aren’t aware, around the same time that Twitter began instituting Trans-Klan policies, Dorsey began welcoming pedophiles to his platform.  The new pedophile term is “MAP” or Minor Attracted Person.

An example of one such bio is listed by @LNomap

“Hey, I’m Leo and I’m 16 and I use he/him pronouns (trans guy ftm).  I’m a nomap (aka boys 2-7, nonexclusive) I don’t act on my attraction, I’m not a predator.” 


A sixteen-year-old girl (if she’s telling the truth) who identifies as a “trans-man” and a pedophile who is sexually attracted to little boys ages 2 – 7 years old but claims not to act on this sexual attraction.

Many users have made videos listing such disturbing and disgusting examples.

CreepShow Art on Youtube has been a voice of outrage at this policy in video after video.

MAP’S were allowed to openly discuss their sexual attraction to prepubescent children on Twitter.  When Twitter clamped down at some point late last year as a result of two years of pushback, Psychology Today responded by criticizing them for not being more supportive of pedophiles.

It’s not really surprising that those who believe in “fixing” children through genital mutilation that they term “medicine” would also be friendly to those who believe in “liberating” children through sexual exploitation that they term “loving.”

Consider the new trend at Taxpayer-Funded Public Library called “Drag Queen Story Hour” teaching children 3 – 11 to Twerk.


Much of current Trans-Mania is built on a philosophical foundation that originated in modern times from the writings of Simone de Beauvoir and Shulamith Firestone and being pushed legislatively by Speaker Pelosi.

Simone de Beauvoir was a philosopher who in the 1940s developed a system of thought known as “existentialism” with her lover and partner Jean-Paul Sarte.  In 1949, she published The Second Sex that argued “Gender” is not the by-product of Biological Sex, but rather a socially created idea that oppressed women and forced on them an in-authentic life – one of the great sins of Existentialist thought.

De Beauvoir, who at the time was not a feminist, believed that Socialist Economics and Existentialist Ethics would result in the emancipation of women.  De Beauvoir was not an advocate of Transgenderism, she herself was making a complex argument for her version of gender equality arguing that women were in fact forced to adopt a masculine persona (or become trans-men) to achieve equality rather than being respected as different but equal.

De Beauvoir rejected both Plato’s idea in the Republic of granting women equality after they had been trained to be men to behave like men and Aristotle’s declaration that “that a female is an incomplete male or ‘as it were, a deformity’”

But her ideas helped create the foundation for Trans-Mania by divorcing Gender from Biological Sex.  Gender was after all, in De Beauvoir’s view, a way that male society kept women in their place, rather than the product of biological reality, and therefore a social construct.

But there is so much more to the story than this, De Beauvoir herself had an incomplete gendered experience prior to writing “The Second Sex.

“In writing The Second Sex I became aware, for the first time, that I myself was leading a false life, or rather, that I was profiting from this male-oriented society without even knowing it. What had happened is that quite early in my life I had accepted the male values, and was living accordingly.”

That is De Beauvoir for all intents and purposes had been living as a Masculine Woman or a “Trans-Man” to achieve sex equality (and every page of The Second Sex is filled with her fury at it).

This is the part that de Beauvoir shared but there was more to it than that.

Throughout her life, de Beauvoir was in a toxic relationship with Jean-Paul Sarte, who apparently was no good in bed.  De Beauvoir began using her position as a teacher to seduce under-age female students and then groomed them for sexual relations with her boyfriend

In one article she is described as:

“astonishingly, it was her craven desire to please him that led de Beauvoir to groom young female lovers for Sartre, commonly girls she had bedded herself.” 

It wasn’t until at the age of 39 (while separated from Sarte), that Simone de Beauvoir would experience her first sexually healthy relationship and her first orgasm with an American writer Nelson Algren.

It was right after this experience in 1947, that Simone de Beauvoir began working on The Second Sex.

De Beauvoir’s ideas would be built upon in the early 1970s, by early Women’s Liberationist/Radical Feminist Shulamith Firestone who did one better.  Firestone argued not for equality of the sexes liberated from the myth of gender, but for the abolishment of sex altogether in her work The Dialectic of Sex.

Among other things, Shulamith argued for the Abolishment of Sex and Motherhood, and for incest and pedophilia as a means of human liberation.

“The reproduction of the species by one sex for the benefit of both would be replaced by (at least the option of) artificial reproduction: children would born to both sexes equally, or independently of. either, however, one chooses to look at it; the dependence of the child on the mother (and vice versa) would give way to a greatly shortened dependence on a small group of others in general, and any remaining inferiority to adults in physical strength would be compensated for culturally. The division of labor would be ended by the elimination of labor altogether (through cybernetics). The tyranny of the biological family would be broken.”

“if a child does not know his own mother, or at least does not attach a special value to her over others, it is unlikely that he would choose her as his first love object, only to have to develop inhibitions on this love. It is possible that the child might form his first close physical relationships with people his own size out of sheer physical convenience, just as men and women, all else being equal, might prefer each other over those of the same sex for sheer physical fit. But if not, if he should choose to relate sexually to adults, even if he should happen to pick his own genetic mother, there would be no a priori reasons for her to reject his sexual advances, because the incest taboo would have lost its function.”

“Thus, without the incest taboo, adults might return within a few generations to a more natural polymorphous sexuality, the concentration on genital sex and orgasmic pleasure-giving way to total physical/emotional relationships that INCLUDED that. Relations with children would include as much genital sex as the child was capable of — probably considerably more than we now believe — but because genital sex would no longer be the central focus of the relationship, lack of orgasm would not present a serious problem. Adult/child and homosexual sex taboos would disappear.”

And these ideas about Gender, are now being institutionalized by the Trans-Klan and their allies.

It’s also no surprise that they would embrace this dystopian vision of the world.  The biggest cultural proponent of Trans-Mania is Hollywood, which has also rallied around Roman Polanski for years.

Hollywood can brag about expelling him from the Academy in 2017, but in 2009 over 100 major figures in the Entertainment Industry signed a petition demanding he be released from prison.  On The View, LGBTQ+ allies like Whoopi Goldberg and Melissa Gilbert publicly proclaimed that Roman Polanski in his mid-40s, luring a 13-year-old-girl to his house for a topless photoshoot, intoxicating her with alcohol, drugging her with Quaaludes and sodomizing her was not a “rape, rape.”

Melissa Gilbert didn’t back-peddle on these comments until she decided to run for Congress as a Democrat and Republicans had the audacity to point them out (thankfully Gilbert lost her election).

Likewise, Hollywood’s newest juggernaut Netflix revealed that it had struck a deal with Saudi Arabia to censor political criticism of the country on its platform so they could allow LGBTQ+ content to stream there.  Netflix also streamed and defended the movie “Cuties” portraying 11-year-old girls Twerking, until a Texas Grand Jury indicted them for:

“visual material which depicts the lewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a clothed or partially clothed child who was younger than 18 years of age at the time the visual material was created, which appeals to the prurient interest in sex, and has no serious, literary, artistic, political, or scientific value,”

What makes Shulamith’s views forgivable is the fact that she was later diagnosed with aggressive paranoid schizophrenia, for which she was institutionalized a number of times.  Firestone also developed  Capgras delusion.  Shulamith Firestone, despite advocating evil, was herself a damaged and mentally ill woman in need of psychiatric and medical treatment.

What is unforgivable is the fact that these views are now being institutionalized as practice in the U.S. House of Representatives by Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Pelosi embraced this anti-family, misogynistic/misandrist, pro-pedophile, pro-incest schizophrenic diatribe earlier this year in House Rules replacing terms such as “mother” “father” “son” “daughter” “brother” and “sister” with “parent” “child” and “sibling.”  This action was blasted by former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (the first female war veteran to run for President) stating:

“It absolutely does the very opposite of [empowering women], and it’s the height of hypocrisy for people who claim to be the champions of rights for women to deny the very biological existence of women,” said Gabbard.”

Gabbard was 100% right and this wasn’t a mistake by an 80-year-old woman.

In 2007, when becoming the first and only Woman Speaker of the House of Representatives (an accomplishment now erased by these rules), Pelosi made a point of showcasing herself as “a mom.” Pelosi’s about-face raises the question of if she was ever really “a mother” or just a politician all along exploiting the natural feelings of mothers for votes and political power.

Shulamith Firestone’s Radical Feminism was certainly popular in the 1970s when Nancy Pelosi was coming up through the ranks of her career. Whether intentional or not, the world that Pelosi is working to create and normalize is pedophiliac, anti-family, anti-sexual, and fertile ground for fascism.


One of the biggest cracks in LGBTQ+ legitimacy is the fact that their arguments now contradict other narratives they have spun out.

Their targeted hatred of J.K. Rowling has everything to do with the fact that she pointed out, “If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction.”

For decades the focus of the LGBTQ+ was legitimizing homosexuality and same-sex marriage.  Gay men and Lesbian women were encouraged to love themselves for who they were, not try to change themselves.  But now Transgenderism is preaching self-hatred of who they are and the body they have,  and encouraging surgery to “fix them.”

In the afore-mentioned case of Eric Aguillion, what if Eric had been Erica and she was a lesbian, lured to the un-named female impersonator’s apartment and penetrated?  Would it be male/female rape or two women having sex?  If a woman can after all have a penis and testicles – then does lesbianism even exist?

Youtube Commentator Arielle Scarcella and Lesbian activist put together a video commentary documenting how young girls and specifically those who were diagnosed as “Transgender” are now de-transitioning.

But then again Arielle Scarcella also did a video “This Trans Woman Uses Her Penis During Sex.”

This issue is currently being raised by “Get the L Out – Lesbian Not Queer –“ in the United Kingdom.

Among their list of grievances on their website is:

  • Cotton ceiling = Rape
  • Lesbians are same-sex attracted.
  • Lesbians do not have penises.
  • Lesbians do not want to have sex with men who identify as trans-women.
  • The LGBT community, including Pride events and marches, are denying the definition of lesbianism, defining lesbianism’s exclusive same-sex attraction as hate speech.
  • The LGBT community is coercing lesbians to accept penises as female organs and heterosexual intercourse as a lesbian sexual practice.
  • We oppose this manipulative ideology and denounce it as a form of rape culture aimed at lesbians, as well as a form of conversion therapy.
  • Transition harms lesbians
  • Trans-ideology with the support of the LGBT community promotes the medical transition of lesbians and pushes harmful drugs and unnecessary medical practices on lesbians’ healthy bodies. These are a form of misogynist medical abuse against lesbians.”

Actress Ellen Page first represented herself as heterosexual, until she was supposedly outed as a Lesbian.  For years Page preached Lesbian Rights, until recently she declared herself to be a Trans-Man.  Was any of it real?

Consider how her Wikipedia Bio reads (and yes it looks like an illiterate schizophrenic wrote it):

“On February 14, 2014, Page, who was then presenting as female, came out as gay[7] during a speech at the Human Rights Campaign‘s “Time to Thrive” conference in Las Vegas. . . On December 1, 2020, Page came out as transgender on his social media accounts, specified his pronouns as he/him and they/them, and revealed his new name, Elliot.”

All mention and reference to Ellen Page as a Lesbian has been removed from her Wiki Bio.

In 2014, however, she specifically gave a speech before Trans-Klan organization “The Human Rights Campaign” declaring:

“I’m here today because I’m gay, and because maybe I can make a difference.”  She added: “I feel a personal obligation and a social responsibility. I also do it selfishly, because I am tired of hiding and I am tired of lying by omission.”

No mention of being a “Trans-Man.”  Only fawning adoration from Susan Sarandon, Debra Messing and Dane Cook.

Yet only a year before her dramatic announcement she was giving interviews about being a Lesbian declaring:

“I came out when I was 27 years old. Like, what? I wasn’t talking about who I was and being my authentic self because I was an actress in Hollywood,” said Page, who married the choreographer and dancer Emma Portner last year. “That’s absurd. We need to look at these things as absurd.”

Also a year before, Page proudly told an interviewer that:

“Do you think Juno eventually grew up to be a lesbian?” Out’s own Rose Dommu asked her this summer. “Yeah. Yes. So many of my characters, quite frankly,” the actress replied.

But lying seems to be the only thing Page is capable of.

She continues to play a female actress in a series.  The only thing that appears for certain is that she is just a manipulative actress who jumps who exploits the very real pain and suffering of individuals with Gender Identity problems as a vehicle for her failed career.

Perhaps worse, Page is now claiming a Mastectomy makes a woman into a man – spitting in the face of every single Breast Cancer survivor who dreads a surgery that they don’t get to choose.

The  Trans-Klan is now proclaiming the existence of “The Gay Trans Male” who is “attracted to men and identifying as male” suggesting that decades of talk about male homosexuality and exclusive sexual interest in other men was just talk.

Then consider how these individuals think and are encouraged to think by their “therapists”:

“As a therapist who has worked with many transgender men who also identify as gay, I know that it is common for gay trans men to experience a flooding of thoughts when being out in the gay male community. Some of these involve anxiety and fear, especially when going to bars and clubs. Most of these clients share the fear that not having a penis could put them in a precarious situation. Their thoughts generally fall into the following themes: 

  • Would someone find out they don’t have a penis?
  • Would someone hurt them, or even sexually assault them, because they don’t have a penis?
  • Will they be able to go to the bathroom without worry and bother?
  •  Is someone going to make rude comments, or fetishizing ones, or tell them they don’t belong?
  • How much of their night is going to be spent in this state of anxiety? 
  • Does the cost of experiencing these thoughts outweigh the benefits of going out?”

Once again the focus is not on the victim being deceived and harmed but on the Tranny and whether they can pull off their con-job. Trans-anxiety is that of every shoplifter, con artist, embezzler and every criminal – can I get away with my crime against another person without suffering any consequences?

Worse, the “therapist” is apparently encouraging this sort of dishonest and predatory behavior!

The entire social-psychological approach is exploitive, narcissistic, and predatory with complete disregard to their victims, except how they might react as a result of the violation inflicted on them.

If homosexuality is trans-phobic in its exclusion of women identifying as men or men identifying as women, then it suggests homosexuality itself is not real and more to the point is a developed phobia and psychiatric disorder.  If a woman impersonates a man and then specifically attempts to have sexual relations with a gay man who she is aware is sexually oriented towards other real males and is rejected is she being homophobic or him being transphobic or is it both?

It is this just evidence that what we are witnessing in the LGBTQ+ alphabet soup of mental illness and multiple personality disorders clashing with each other and undermines the legitimacy of any social or legal recognition of the aims and goals of these movements.


These dueling narratives also raise questions about the 2015 Supreme Court ruling, so narrowly decided by a 5-4 vote, that heard “the petitioners, 14 same-sex couples and two men whose same-sex partners are deceased.”  The decision itself was always on the shaky ground of the non-existent “dignity clause” in the U.S. Constitution – but if the petitioner’s entire basis for bringing their case never really existed then the entire ruling’s legality is further questionable.

The court’s ruling was on even shakier grounds when it declared “same-sex couples” capable of procreation arguing “The marriage laws at issue thus harm and humiliate the children of same-sex couples”  before conflating medical disability such as infertility with biological inability “This does not mean that the right to marry is less meaningful for those who do not or cannot have children. Precedent protects the right of a married couple not to procreate, so the right to marry cannot be conditioned on the capacity or commitment to procreate.” 

But the court’s main argument that:

“It is demeaning to lock same-sex couples out of a central institution of the Nation’s society, for they too may aspire to the transcendent purposes of marriage.”

If one partner can change his or her sex through legal declaration of themselves as a man or a woman (even if only for the purpose of marriage) regardless of biological sex then the Court’s central argument is null and void.

It also challenges the Supreme Court’s other assertion that:

For much of the 20th century, moreover, homosexuality was treated as an illness. When the American Psychiatric Association published the first Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 1952, homosexuality was classified as a mental disorder, a position adhered to until 1973. See Position Statement on Homosexuality and Civil  Rights, 1973, in 131 Am. J. Psychiatry 497 (1974). Only in more recent years have psychiatrists and others recognized that sexual orientation is both a normal expression of human sexuality and immutable. See Brief for American Psychological Association et al. as Amici Curiae 7–17.”

Website AutoStraddle published article :

How to Have Lesbian Sex With a Trans Woman

“Some lesbian, bisexual and queer women have penises. Trans women come all sorts of ways, and some of us haven’t had surgery yet or don’t want to. Also some trans women are queer! The conversation about trans lesbian sex often focuses on anal, or on using the non-trans partner’s genitals — but that’s not all there is. Trans lesbians and their partners can have sex in so many fun ways that do involve their penis and testicles but don’t necessarily trigger dysphoria. There’s a lot of fun you can have, and while sex between someone with a penis and someone with a vagina is the norm of what we’re presented in society, not many of those tips deal with the fact that maybe one of those people is a woman. So I’m here to help you have the best girl-on-girl sex you’ve ever had as or with a trans woman.”

If the definition of Same-Sex Couples includes a female and a male who identifies as a female or vice versa, then laws restricting marriage to “men and women” defined as anatomically male and female, impose no substantial hardship or disability on Gay and Lesbian Couples.  A gay man need only find a “man with a vagina” and a Lesbian Woman need only find a “woman with a Penis” to contract a legal marriage.

States wishing to exclude anatomically/biological/genetic male-male or female-female have a basis for doing so without infringing on the “dignity of gays and lesbians.”  States could easily prohibit some forms of “same-sex marriage” on health grounds that HIV Spreads Less Easily to Anatomically Male/Female Couples.  After all, for decades States required blood tests before issuing marriage licenses as part of a health campaign against syphilis and rubella.

After all according to HIV.GOV :

“In 2019, the largest percentages of HIV infections were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact (66% overall and 81% among males.)” 

Since anatomically male/male sexual unions (which according to these new Gender Norms could also be heterosexual if one of them identifies as a woman) are 20 times more likely to get infected from an HIV-positive partner, than an anatomically male/female sexual union (which according to these New Gender Norms could be gay if both of them identify as men or as women) – it makes sense to exclude anatomically male/male or female/female couples regardless of whether they are gay or heterosexual to prevent incentivizing disease!


In evaluating whether or not Transgenderism is real or psychosis, it’s necessary to get back to foundations.

A “Trans-Woman” is an individual with XY Chromosome Genetics, Natural produced Testosterone, a Penis and Testicles, and is biologically, genetically, physically, anatomically a male.  He has never and will never experience menstruation or pregnancy.  Some of these men will undergo plastic surgery that will imitate the female body but never truly replicate it.  Some will take hormone regimes to block their body from creating their natural hormone.

Simply put – at best they are a castrated male.

No amount of elective surgery will ever change their genetic code, their body’s natural state which re-asserts itself if hormone treatment is stopped.

The same goes for Trans-Women.

Contrary to the claims of most Trans-Activists, the wealth of medical research is not on their side.

Dr. Paul R. McHugh, who operated one of the first gender identity clinics at Johns Hopkins in the 1970s, has gone on record opposing “sex-change surgery.”

In his essay Surgical Sex, he commented among other things:

“Those I met after surgery would tell me that the surgery and hormone treatments that had made them “women” had also made them happy and contented. None of these encounters were persuasive, however. The post-surgical subjects struck me as caricatures of women. They wore high heels, copious makeup, and flamboyant clothing; they spoke about how they found themselves able to give vent to their natural inclinations for peace, domesticity, and gentleness—but their large hands, prominent Adam’s apples, and thick facial features were incongruous (and would become more so as they aged). Women psychiatrists whom I sent to talk with them would intuitively see through the disguise and the exaggerated postures. “Gals know gals,” one said to me, “and that’s a guy.”

“We saw the results as demonstrating that just as these men enjoyed cross-dressing as women before the operation so they enjoyed cross-living after it. But they were no better in their psychological integration or any easier to live with. With these facts in hand, I concluded that Hopkins was fundamentally cooperating with a mental illness. We psychiatrists, I thought, would do better to concentrate on trying to fix their minds and not their genitalia.” 

DetransVoices.Org (a non-profit to support those who have undergone medical intervention) describes “sex reassignment surgery in the following manner:

SRS is a surgery performed to create the appearance of the sex organs of the opposite sex, but it does not create fully functioning sex organs. The theory is that changing the appearance of the patient’s genitals (or breasts, in the case of top surgery) will alleviate their emotional distress over their biological sex. Some surgeons strive to create correct aesthetics and as much function as possible for their patients. However, outcomes and results can vary widely depending upon surgical techniques, patient health, and overall recovery.”

Dr. Marie N. Robinson, who treated women for sexual disorders for decades, wrote in her sex manual for married couples The Power of Sexual Surrender an entire chapter on the subject of “The Masculine Woman” noting:

“In her formative years the young girl is not properly prepared for this role, if womanhood is not treated as desirable, honorable, and lovable, she will automatically turn against it.  The game, to the young mind, will seem far too risky for the candle.  As the years’ pass, nothing disproves this contention and the original childlike fears, unmodified by reality, remain intact or even increase.

In other words, to the improperly prepared child, facing the reality of being a woman is in itself traumatic.” 

In another Chapter, Robinson relates how some “Medical Experts” of her day, much like the “Experts now, tried to cure another case (not related to Gender Dysphoria) of sexual frigidity in a woman through surgery not psychiatric treatment:

“A far more serious misunderstanding of the nature of true feminine sexuality and of the nature of frigidity is shown by the following case, told to me by a psychiatric colleague.

A pretty young woman came to him stating that she had been unable to have sexual satisfaction in intercourse.  She had told her physician of her problem two years previously.  He had examined her and told her that her clitoris was too far from her vagina.  He informed her that this biological fact made it impossible for her husband to contact the clitoris with his penis during intercourse and that this was causing her frigidity.  The physician advised an operation that would bring the clitoris and the vagina closer together, thus allowing the penis to contact the clitoris during intercourse.

The woman, in all good faith and with a laudable desire to be a good wife, had gone through with this grotesque surgical procedure.  After the operation, when she was able to have intercourse again, it had apparently worked.  For two months she had an orgasm during intercourse.  Then slowly but surely her ability to respond disappeared.  Within three months she had become totally frigid.

Nothing could be more mistaken than such an approach to the solution of a sexual problem in a woman.  In the first place, surgery performed on the genitalia of a woman who is already sexually disturbed can cause profound shock to her psychological, deepen her disturbance immeasurably –– such was the case with this woman, my colleague told me.  Second, the fact that the clitoris and not the vagina is responsive is a form of frigidity in itself.  Even if this maddeningly ridiculous operation had worked in the manner the physician had hoped, it would only have perpetuated a situation that was in itself, psychologically speaking, pathological.” 

“Sex-Re-assignment Surgery” is exactly the same thing.


One of the least publicized aspects of the Transgender Mania is that so-called “sex-change operations” are irreversible.

Last year the victims of the Gender Clinic in London spoke out about being rushed onto puberty blockers and a court ruled against the clinic for trying to put kids as young as 13 on them.

These kids however were lucky they only went on Puberty Blockers and were able to stop them.  Those that went for surgical intervention have a much more complicated path and will never fully regain their former body.

According to DetransVoices.Org:

Full reversal of SRS is impossible. Most de-trans individuals who underwent SRS choose to live with the genitals they have, instead of undergoing further SRS. Some males who de-transition and underwent vaginoplasty opt to have phalloplasty to regain the appearance of male anatomy. This is a very expensive and complicated surgery, and often takes two years to fully complete. For females who had phalloplasty, the removal of the phallus and a vaginoplasty is the only option if one wishes to have the appearance of female genitalia.”

This didn’t stop Trans-Klan ally NBC News downplaying “de-transition” or advocating prescribing puberty blockers for 12-year-olds.

To date NONE of the celebrities that have proclaimed it a wonderful, life-affirming process have likewise pledged to pick up the tab for both surgical interventions in the event they influence someone to undergo an irreversible surgical procedure and end up regretting it.

Not Jamie Lee CurtisEllen DeGeneresWhoopi GoldbergDebra MessingHugh JackmanJames GunnEllen PageJoel McHaleJimmy KimmelFelicity HuffmanMark RuffaloBrad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Charlize Theron, Dwyane Wade, Cynthia Nixon, Warren Beatty, or Cher.

All of these individuals are proud to support normalizing surgical genital mutilation but none of them really will take responsibility or live with the consequences if they are wrong.

After all, Hollywood also pushed the narrative that having an abortion was “as simple as going to the dentist” and “a simple operation,” “abortion was a dirty word, it’s not anymore” in the 1970s.  They signed a public declaration in Ms. Magazine declaring “We Had Abortions.”

62 million-plus abortions later Americans have finally realized that no it was not just “going to the dentist.

And surgery to “re-assign sex” is neither an accurate or honest description of irreversible genital mutilation.


It should be noted that “Transsexualism” itself was removed from the World Health Organizations’ disease manual only in 2018, and then in response to activists demanding that the mental illness be normalized.

TransGender Europe (TGEU) an activist group has been orchestrating the International Day of Action for Trans Depathologization

The National LGBTQ Task Force has campaigned to remove Transgenderism as a mental disorder from DSM-5, declaring “Gender variance is not a psychiatric disease.”

In 2012, GLAAD celebrated removing the term “Gender Identity Disorder” from the DSM.

This is not medical research, it is pseudo-science psycho babble that attempts to erase 120 years of psychiatric research, including from psychiatrists that spent decades treating patients with this.

Consider, singer Demi Lovato’s recent declaration that she is “non-binary.”  Previously Lovato had written songs about a guy who “make me wanna act like a girl” in 2013.

What happened between then and now?

Well, in 2018 Lovato had a massive near-death overdose after she consumed a cocktail of Meth, Molly (Ecstasy), Coke, Weed, Alcohol and OxyContin.  According to her doctors she had five to ten minutes to live when she was rescued, she’d had a heart attack, three strokes, seizures and is legally blind.  Prior to this Lovato had a history of addiction and being diagnosed with Bi-Polar Disorder.  She also had brain damage now as a result of her near-death experience.

Is it any surprise that Lovato is now claiming she’s a “they/them” and a “non-binary” when she is also a brain-damaged individual?

More recently researchers attempted to engage in their circular logic claiming that:

“The male and female brain have structural differences,” he says. Men and women tend to have different volumes in certain areas of the brain.

“When we look at the transgender brain, we see that the brain resembles the gender that the person identifies as,” Dr. Altinay says. For example, a person who is born with a penis but ends up identifying as a female often actually has some of the structural characteristics of a “female” brain.”

But this doublethink is inherently illogical.  If a brain resembles the gender the person identifies as how can that brain and gender ever be established or measured?  If Men and women have different brains how are we establishing a male versus female brain?  The only way to do this is to identify them by the body they are in.  But if brains are identified by the body they are in then a “Transgender brain” is really a male brain if in a male body or a female brain if in a female body.

“Medical Experts” have not proven that female brains are in male bodies or male brains are in female bodies. All they have really proven is that some men and some women have similar brain structures!  

Incidentally in  2020 it finally came out that people that claim to be “Trans” and “Gender-Diverse” are also between 3 to 6 times more likely to be autistic.


Perhaps the most devastating argument against Transgenderism and rarely heard is the existence of hermaphroditism.

In the early 1980s, Caroline Cossey, a minor character in Bond movie, was outed as “transexual” or “Transgender.”  PinkNews, another Trans-Klan media outlet proclaimed Cossey was a pioneer of Transgender rights.  Cosey was born “Barry Kenneth Cossey” and later transition to become Caroline.

This story is occasionally mentioned by Trans-Activists but is not the major story it should be for one reason – it discredits the entire Transgender agenda.

Cossey’s “transgenderism” can actually be quantified in genetic terms, rather than abstract “self-identification.”  Cossey was born with a rare genetic condition known as Klinefelter’s Syndrome where individuals are born with an XXY chromosome, instead of just XY or XX.  In Cossey’s case, she reportedly had an even rarer form of it and had a genetic makeup of XXXY.  In other words, Cossey wasn’t just pretending or self-identifying, she actually has a genetic code that for all intents and purposes is a form of genetic hermaphroditism.  Even though an individual suffering from this Syndrome is anatomically male its symptoms include:

Boys and teenagers

Signs and symptoms may include:

  • Taller than average stature
  • Longer legs, shorter torso and broader hips compared with other boys
  • Absent, delayed or incomplete puberty
  • After puberty, less muscle and less facial and body hair compared with other teens
  • Small, firm testicles
  • Small penis
  • Enlarged breast tissue (gynecomastia)
  • Weak bones
  • Low energy levels
  • Tendency to be shy and sensitive
  • Difficulty expressing thoughts and feelings or socializing
  • Problems with reading, writing, spelling or math


Signs and symptoms may include:

  • Low sperm count or no sperm
  • Small testicles and penis
  • Low sex drive
  • Taller than average height
  • Weak bones
  • Decreased facial and body hair
  • Less muscular compared with other men
  • Enlarged breast tissue
  • Increased belly fat

More recently Trans-Activists have touted the case of “the Danish Girl” Lili Elbe – one of the first to try a “sex reassignment surgery.”  Various theories about Elbe can be advanced whether he was mentally ill or not, but even in the published memoir “Man into Woman: An Authentic Record of a Change of Sex” the preface notes:

“[Elbe] began to study books on sexual pathology and gradually came to the conclusion that although his external organs were those of a male, and quite normal (though perhaps rather undeveloped), yet his body contained in it the internal sexual organs of a female in addition.

Some of the doctors to whom he went thought him neurotic, some thought him homosexual; but he himself denied the truth of both these diagnoses. One doctor treated him with X-rays, and later on Andreas attributed the shrunken state of the female sexual organs which were found in his abdomen to the destructive effect of this X-ray treatment.

Just as things seemed at their worst he met a famous German doctor from Dresden, who agreed that Andreas was probably an intermediate sexual type, furnished, by some sport of nature, with both male and female gonads. He explained that there were probably rudimentary ovaries in Andreas’ abdomen, but that these were unable to develop properly because of the inhibiting influence of the testicles which Andreas also possessed.”

In other words – “The Danish Girl” may have really been suffering from a form of hermaphroditism, not transgenderism.

Hermaphroditism is a real and quantifiable medical condition, that surgery can assist.  The difference between it and Transgenderism is that it is both physical and genetic and can be both observed, documented, and tested.  It’s also incredibly rare.

The existence of Hermaphroditism and the aforementioned syndrome is evidence that Transgenderism, which can not be quantified genetically, physically, anatomically, etc . . . is entirely psychiatric and a psychiatric disorder that should be treated as a psychiatric disorder – not a cause for social upheaval and change.


The issue of Transgenderism is the latest fight in the sex war that feminism started centuries ago.

Marie N. Robinson describes it as one of the defensive strategies women developed in response to feeling displaced during the Industrial Revolution and quotes yet two more Psychiatrists on the subject:

“What did this movement want to achieve?  Let me quote to you what two profound students of feminism, Ferdinand Lundberg and Marina F. Farnham, had to say about it in their book Modern Women, The Lost Sex: “Far from being a movement,” they wrote, “ for the greater self-realization of women, as it professed to be, feminism was the very negation of femaleness.  Although hostile to men and hostile to children, it was at the bottom most hostile to women.  It bade women commit suicide as women and attempt to live as men . . . Psychologically, feminism had a single objective: the achievement of maleness by the female, or the nearest possible approach to it.  In so far as was attained, it spelled only vast individual suffering for men as well as women, and much public disorder.” 

Daphne Clair de Jong, founder and President of Feminists for Life of New Zealand and Romance Writer, penned an essay “The Feminist Sell-Out” on the subject in 1978 declaring:

The women’s movement suffers from three classic defense mechanisms associated with minority group status: self-rejection, identification with the dominant group, and displacement.  

The demand for abortion at will is a symptom of group self-hatred and total rejection, not of sex-role but of sex identity.

The womb is not the be-all and end-all of women’s existence.  But it is the physical center of her sexual identity, which is an important aspect of her self-image and personality.  To reject its function, or to regard it as a handicap, a danger or a nuisance, is to reject a vital part of her own personhood.  Every woman need not be a mother, but unless every woman can identify with the potential motherhood of all women, not equality is possible.  African-Americans gained nothing by straightening their kinky hair and imitating the white middle-class.  Equality began to become a reality only when they insisted on acceptance of their different qualities ––“Black is Beautiful.” 

The is all the more true today.

In 2018, Feminists targeted Hillary Clinton of all people because her Twitter bio described her first and foremost as “Wife, Mom.”


The current push behind Trans-Mania, especially financially, originates with corporate and billionaire backers eager to create new markets.  Freelance Journalist and Blogger Jennifer Bilek has documented in both The Federalist and her blog The 11th Hour the surgical, counseling, and pharmaceutical markets that are being set up.

Bilek writes in The Federalist:

Transgenderism: A New Medical and Lifestyle Market

It seems obvious now to look at the money behind transgenderism. Many new markets have opened because of it. The first gender clinic for children opened in Boston in 2007. In the past ten years, more than 30 clinics for children with purported gender dysphoria have arisen in the United States alone, the largest serving 725 patients.

Over the past decade, there has been an explosion in transgender medical infrastructure across the United States and the world to “treat” transgender people. In addition to gender clinics proliferating across the United States, hospital wings are being built for specialized surgeries, and many medical institutions are clamoring to get on board with the new developments.

Doctors are being trained in cadaver symposiums across the world in all manner of surgeries related to transgender individuals, including phalloplastyvaginoplastyfacial feminization surgeryurethral procedures, and more. More and more American corporations are covering transgender surgeries, drugs, and other expenses. Endocrinologists seeking the fountain of youth in hormones for more than a generation, and the subsequent earnings for marketing those hormones, are still on a quest for gold.

Puberty blockers are another growing market. The plastic surgery arm of medicine is staged for an infusion of cash as well as organ transplants, especially womb transplants for men identifying as women who may want future pregnancies. These surgeries are already being practiced on animals and the first successful womb implant from a deceased female donor to another female has already been a success. Biogenetics is poised to be the investment of the future, says Rothblatt, who has headed a massive pharmaceutical corporation and is now heavily invested in biogenetics and transplants.

Transgenderism has certainly made its way into the American marketplace, so it seems important to consider the implications of this as we pass laws regarding transgender individuals’ and our civil liberties. Transgenderism sits square in the middle of the medical-industrial complex, which is by some estimates even bigger than the military-industrial complex.”

Her expose names the Billionaire families – especially the Pritzker family – hoping to reap even more money at the stock market through pain profiteering.

Those inclined to be skeptical should only look back at the past ten years and the Opioid Crisis stocked and created by the Billionaire Sackler Family, who pocketed billions by exploiting the medical conditions of ordinary Americans.  These sleazy, evil people should be charged with 1st Degree Pre-Meditated Murder, instead, they are working towards immunity from Opioid Lawsuits.

The Gender Industry is no different.  Bilek’s latest blog post, Big Pharma Exploits and Monetizes ’Trans Identity,’ documents how this new market works.

Those inclined to be skeptical should consider the fact that this isn’t the first time gender identity crisis has been exploited by corporations to create consumer markets.  In 1963, Betty Friedan’s The Feminist Mystique opened its first chapter with a description of a similar phenomenon in the post-WWII era:

“Manufacturers put out brassieres with false bosoms of foam rubber for little girls of ten. And on 31 advertisement for a child’s dress, sizes 3-6x, in the New York Times in the fall of 1960, said: “She Too 32 Can Join the Man-Trap Set.”… 

In a New York hospital, a woman had a nervous breakdown when she found she could not breastfeed 34 her baby. In other hospitals, women dying of cancer refused a drug which research had proved might 35 save their lives: its side effects were said to be unfeminine. “If I have only one life, let me live it as a 36 blonde,” a larger-than-life-sized picture of a pretty, vacuous woman proclaimed from the newspaper, 37 magazines, and drugstore ads. And across America, three out of every ten women dyed their hair blonde. 38 They ate a chalk called Metrecal, instead of food, to shrink to the size of the thin young models.  Department-store buyers reported that American women, since 1939, had become three and four sizes 40 smaller. “Women are out to fit the clothes, instead of vice-versa,” one buyer said.”

A generation before during the Roaring Twenties, Gender confusion after the collapse of Civilization during the War to End All Wars, resulted in the Flapper woman who strove for a “boy body” and entire industry to help her achieve it.  Thoroughly Modern Millie’s opening song depicts Millie (Julie Andrews) arriving in New York City and going through multiple stores obtaining new fashion devices to transform her into the modern woman – including the transgender practice of “breast-binding.”

These trends and practices went well beyond fashion trends or marketing into pain profiteering.  The current Gender Industry is merely the 21st Century version of this marketplace.

They also aren’t the only ones exploiting Trans-Mania for their benefit.


During the 1960s, Charles Manson and his cult believed that they could start a racial war that would destroy white and black Americans while they waited it out and then Manson and “the family” would come out of hiding and rule post-apocalyptic America.  This doomsday scenario dubbed was “Helter Skelter” and prompted the many violent and psychotic actions of the family that was tolerated until their killings became too public and too violent.

Such a scenario is exactly what those hoping to benefit from the current Trans-Mania in our society.

Mother Teresa warned at the International Conference on Women in 1994:

“God told us, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” So first I am to love myself rightly and then to love my neighbor like that.

But how can I love myself unless I accept myself as God has made me? Those who deny the beautiful differences between men and women are not accepting themselves as God has made them, and so cannot love the neighbor. They will only bring division, unhappiness, and destruction of peace to the world. For example, as I have often said, abortion is the greatest destroyer of peace in the world today, and those who want to make women and men the same are all in favor of abortion.”

Mother Teresa’s relevant criticisms have been echoed by Atheist Academic Camille Paglia (who has publicly declared herself Lesbian and Transgender).  Paglia’s first came to notoriety in 1990 when she published the major text on these issues Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson – (based on her Yale Thesis, “The Androgynous Dream: the image of the androgyne as it appears in literature and is embodied in the psyche of the artist, with reference to the visual arts and the cinema”).

Paglia (also targeted by the Trans-Klan) has warned that androgyny and transgenderism is a sign of “a civilization starting to unravel”  and warned that the current Transgenderism craze brazenly hinders Human Rights, Ignores Biology and leads to Repression as well as criticizing Trans-Klansmen that throw around the term “Transphobic” to silence dissent.

Paglia’s critique of Transgender Mania and its correlation with Cultural Collapse is also supported by recent history.

In his memoir Lost Splendor,  Prince Felix Youssupov describes the prevalence of transvestism in the last years of Tsarist Russia and Ayn Rand’s autobiographical novel We The Living describes the Masculine Woman Comrade Sonia in the early years of the Soviet Union.  In a 1970s interview silent Movie Star Gloria Swanson talked about being “in Germany when boys were dressing like girls in 1922.” A flourishing LGBTQ+ culture existed in 1920s Berlin for a decade prior to the rise of Nazism.


LGBTQ+ activists today bemoan the Nazi destruction of this Queer Golden era, but fail to recognize that in many respects it actually hastened their rise.  Disturbed sexual psychology played a central role in Hitler’s derangement including speculation that he may have also been homosexual.  It also played a role in the German nation’s quick adoption of Nazism, which was noted by Austrian psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich as early as 1933 in his work The Mass Psychology of Fascism – specifically warning:

“German fascism made every possible effort to anchor itself in the psychic structure, and therefore placed the greatest emphasis on the conversion of adolescents and children.  To do this, it had at its disposal no other means than the creation and the nurturing of submissiveness to authority the basic prerequisite of which is an ascetic, sex-negating upbringing.  The natural sexual strivings for the other sex, strivings which from infancy on urge for gratification, was replaced partly by homosexual and sadistic strivings, partly by asceticism.”

Yet before Nazi Germany or even Fascist Italy, the Soviet Union was both the original Totalitarian State.  Despite its Communist origins, the Soviet Union under Lenin’s dictatorship in the 1920s was a Proto-Fascist Entity and Blue Print both politically and economically.  As part of Lenin’s bid to erase pre-Revolutionary Russia and further destabilize the nation, even more, he aggressively pursued a policy of social libertarianism on homosexualitysexual relations and abortion,  abolishment of marriage and the nuclear family while at the same time concentrating all political power in his own hands and ruthlessly suppressing anyone who did not actively participate.

During the 1920s, the Soviet Union supported the Institut fur Sexualwissenschaft in Berlin that first coined the term “transsexualism” and began promoting and experiment with “sex reassignment surgeries.”  The results were as described above further destabilization of traditional society, weakening non-State institutions of power such as family, personal relationships, religion, tradition, etc . . . and creating a psyche pre-disposed to accept whatever group took power.

Fifteen years later, the Nazis stormed their way to power in Germany, Stalin became an undisputed dictator in the USSR and the entire “homosexual emancipation” movement and policies of social libertarianism were ruthlessly suppressed having served their purpose.

And this is precisely what is happening at Public Institutions across the country.

In 2015 “Drag Queen Story Hour” started in Democrat-controlled San Francisco and has spread nationwide through public libraries.  Jonathan Hamilt of the New York Chapter declared their goal was to instill the imagination and play of gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models.”

It is no coincidence that the U.S. Democrat Party – which in the past year has revealed itself to be particularly Fascist in nature and more than whiling to identify and exploit social divisions – is also pushing LGBTQ+ agenda to create social chaos in American Society.

If anything it is central to their strategy for power.

In the past year, the U.S. Democrat Party has aggressively preached centralization of power in the hands of their Governors and appointed bureaucrats with a shocking resemblance to mid-2000s dystopian movies Revenge of the Sith and  V for Vendetta.  Earlier this year the U.S. Democrat Party expressed horror that a mass protest at the Capitol turned into a violent riot, yet for six months prior its members stoked political violence nationwide including an attempt to storm the White House on May 31, 2020.

It is no coincidence that Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who has led multiple illegal protests at the Capitol and lied about the level of danger she was in to manipulate her social media followers’ emotions, has attempted to exploit a riot she helped stoke by as grounds to abrogate the First Amendment.  It’s also no coincidence that she is also aggressively pushing Transgenderism on minor children, or that she advocates for the normalization of Transgenderism.

Americans consumed by a divisive culture war as we were during the 1960s, specifically one they feel they have no power to change the outcome or save themselves, are less likely to combat the spread of the U.S. Democrat Party’s brand of domestic fascism.

It also is a strategy for permanent political power as the U.S. Democrat Party conceives “sex” as created, changed, assigned, re-assigned by an all-powerful State – not biology or nature.  At present even speaking of biology is a social sin in the Left-Wing political spectrum (Genetic denialism known as Lysenkoism was also the official policy of the Soviet Union).  Further, The U.S. Democrat Party is not working to ease “Transphobia” in American Society – with Star Wars Emperor Palpatine like Machiavellianism, Democrats are trying to provoke it, stoking the Alt-Right, the Religious Right into a frenzy and then use this as an excuse to demand more political power.  Consider the pushing over LGBTQ+ by the Hillary Clinton campaign and TransGender Bathroom Policies by the Obama Administration in 2016.  Even Trans-Activists warned that Barack Obama’s actions were politicizing the issue with his stupid posturing.  In 2019, Democrat Candidates running for the Nomination made a point of raising the issue of abortions for Trans-Women (something that is impossible and showed that these candidates are throwing around words they don’t even understand).  At the same time, Left-Wing political organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center published articles hysterically warning “White Nationalist Threats Against Transgender People Are Escalating.

And because “sex” in this Firestone envisioned dystopia is created by an all-powerful State, Only a political party embracing “Gender diversity” can hold political power as the Guardian of this All-Powerful State.  Political power in this scenario is not awarded by the people as a result of the party submitting itself to elections aka searching tests of popularity.  Instead, it is claimed and demanded or seized by its self-righteous members who declare their ideology as a mandate to rule.

This attitude mirrors identically the mentality of every Totalitarian ideology.  In 1990, Dr. Jeane Kirkpatrick wrote in The Withering Away of the Totalitarian State:

“The Soviet Union was founded by a band of men who believed they had the key to history in a “scientific” doctrine that explained how everything was related to everything else and ultimately depended on property.  With this “key” they were – they believed – in a position to transform society and human nature.  Their doctrine and their conviction reverberated around the world.

For many, the Soviet Union seemed Promethean– the very embodiment of the dream that extraordinary persons can transcend history and mold society and the human beings in it to their will.”

Soviet Refugee Ayn Rand writing during the early 1960s warned in her essay “The Moratorium on Brains”:

“I have stated repeatedly that the trend in this country is toward a fascist system with communist slogans. But what all of today’s pressure groups are busy evading is the fact that neither business nor labor nor anyone else, except the ruling clique, gains anything under fascism or communism or any form of statism—that all become victims of an impartial, egalitarian destruction.” 

And this is what we are witnessing now.

The U.S. Democrat Party, whose elderly leaders and young media stars, are slinging Marxist rhetoric while envisioning an all-powerful State that usurps the place of nature as a solution to the Trans-Halter-Skelter they helped created in the first place.


Despite the current situation, there is a great deal that Iowa Millennials CAN AND SHOULD be done.

For starters, Iowa residents can start by purging the public office of Trans-Klan members.

Abby FinkenauerGlenn Hurst, and Dave Muhlbauer should all be voted down from being elected Iowa’s U.S. Senator.

Iowa Congresswoman Cynthia Axne voted for the Federal “Equality Act” that will institutionalize everything described in this article into Federal law and voted for Nancy Pelosi again and again to be Speaker of the House.

Iowa State Senators Tony Bisignano  Joe Bolkcom  Nate Boulton  Claire Celsi  William A Dotzler Jr  Eric Giddens  Robert Hogg  Pam Jochum  Kevin KinneyJim Lykam  Liz Mathis  Janet Petersen  Herm C. Quirmbach  Amanda Ragan  Jackie Smith  Todd E. Taylor  Sarah Trone Garriot  Zach Wahls have been instrumental allies with the Trans-Klan and LGBTQ+ mania in Iowa.

Two years ago they blocked Katherine Asjes from being appointed to the Board of Medicine.

Iowa Declared Candidate for Governor Ras Smith is listed as an ally of the Trans-Klan by One Iowa Action.

Make an example out of the Iowa Democrat Party ahead of the 2024 Iowa Caucus by voting them out of power.

Iowa Residents and Businesses can divest our dollars from corporations and financial institutions that are bankrolling this psychosis.  Recently an investor group known as American Conservative Values ETF was formed to do just that and liquidate investor dollars from these corporations.   Refuse to bank with U.S. Bank which operates in 55 towns in Iowa or Chase Bank, which just opened its first community bank branch in Iowa last year.  

Account-holders can write US Bank President and Chief Executive Andrew Cecere (both by mail and email) and Chase Bank Co-President, Co-Chief Operating Officer Daniel Pinto and Chief Executive and Chairman Jamie Dimon, expressing their reasons for closing their accounts.

Religious objectors (and not all objectors are religious) and banking online (something that became standard during Covid) with credit unions such as the American Christian Credit UnionChristian Community Credit UnionEvangelical Christian Credit Union and the Christian Credit Union Network.

Iowans can boycott USA Today which bills itself as the largest local-to-national digital media organization in the country, both by refusing to subscribe to it but also by refusing to participate in any of its stories.  Don’t talk to USA Today reporters, don’t provide them with information, etc . . . until they fire every single employee and editor who are allied with the Trans-Klan censorship at their paper.

They can also boycott companies that advertise with the Des Moines Register, a media ally of the Trans-Klan, and media outlets that use phrases like “assigned at birth” “trans-woman” “cis-gender” “biological male” etc . . . just as they can boycott the Corporate Sponsors of Capital City Pride 2021Iowa City Pride (like Riverside Casino and Gold ResortGreen State Credit UnionBig Grove BreweryMidWestOne Bank).

Equally important Iowa residents can and should start sending letters and emails to their local television affiliates taking advantage of the overall low television ratings to pressure them to drop their Trans-Klan Alliances.

NBC Ratings for the ‘woke’ Olympics have already been a disaster.  Write KWWL (NBC 7) and KWQC-TV (NBC 6) and let them know that Trans-Athletes and ‘Woke’ Olympics discouraged you from watching.

ABC Ratings for ’The View’ have been around 2.5 million viewers (in a country with 320 million residents).

By contacting Station Affiliates and letting them know that you will not watch programming that promotes the Trans-Mania, you will effectively start canceling it.

If you contact the Station include the following information Name, Age, Sex, Ethnicity, Parental Status, Number of Children (if you have any), Marital Status and Annual Income.  This demographic information is what Stations use to determine what local programming they show and what they sell to advertisers.

Iowa Residents can demand the state legislature throw the National Education Association out of the State’s Education system and prohibit recognition of unions that attempt to abuse their labor certification to negotiate for workplace rights to engage in social engineering activism.

Iowa can ban state travel to California the same way that California in 2019 prohibited travel to Iowa over refusal to fund “gender transitions.”  Iowa could further make a point of taking a page out of Georgia’s book and re-starting its Film Incentive’s program (albeit with tighter controls and more oversight) to draw the film industry away from California.

Iowa can also start penalizing states like Colorado by banning State Travel due to its State Government becoming a partner of the Trans-Klan in persecuting those that don’t go along with LGBTQ+ alphabet soup.

Under Colorado Governor Democrat and proud Gay Governor Jared Polis – Cakeshop Owner Jack Philips has been repeatedly sued, fined and harassed by the StateWeb Designer Lori Smith is being coerced to create websites in violation of her religious faith.

Most importantly we can make this a defining and winnable issue by pursuing the Constitutional strategy first proposed in the early 2000s of stripping the Federal Judiciary of any jurisdiction over these matters by act of Congress.  Defenders of marriage made this argument against and again before Congressional sub-committees only to be ignored.  Eleven years later the Federal Judiciary showed blatant and willful disregard for Congress and the several States authority and overturned the will of people in both Red and Blue States with a novel ruling on marriage.

Last year despite a Supreme Court that supposedly had moved to the right, it happened again with the Court making up a new definition of the term “sex.”  The U.S. Supreme Court has never been trustworthy on any issue of substance as has been proven by its many idiotic rulings on Slavery, Civil Rights, Labor, Welfare, Abortion, etc . . . provoking some of the biggest social cataclysms in American history – perhaps the worst being the Civil War.

Simply electing do-nothing Republican Presidents and Congresses that appoint disappointing Supreme Court Justices has been a failed strategy for decades.  It’s not particularly surprising when Television Republican Pundit Meghan McCain is a TransKlan allyRepublican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel is openly celebrating PRIDE Month, and the most prominent Republican candidate in the California recall election is Bruce ‘Caitlin’ Jenner.

Congress has the power to fix the problem and it should do so.  Republican office-holders that fail to deliver should be blacklisted at the ballot box and Republican-appointed justices – most notably failed Supreme Court Justice John Roberts – should be removed from the Court.

Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst should be pressured to pursue this strategy in the U.S. Senate and find a new Majority leader to replace do nothing, Mitch McConnell.

Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds should be made to say on the record:

“I am a woman and women do not and have never had penises. I am married to a man and men do not and have never had vaginas.”

If she can’t make that simple commitment to biological reality – can she really be trusted to remain Governor?

There is a lot that can and must be done if we are to avoid Firestone’s Dystopia and end the current Gender Helter-Skelter.

Author: David Krouse