***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on the financial support of our readers to exist. Please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter at $5, $10/month - whatever you think we're worth! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News” — now YOU can actually DO something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250

Democrat State Sen. Claire Celsi did not support Governor Kim Reynolds’ school choice/transparency bill during a Wednesday Iowa Senate Appropriations subcommittee meeting.

Advertisement

Celsi, who said she attended Catholic school and graduated from Dowling Catholic, inquired of her father what he was thinking while raising the money to build Dowling. She said she asked him if eventually they wanted to get public dollars to supplement their budget.

“He said no,” she said. “In fact, it was just the opposite.”

Celsi’s father told her they wanted a place to continue the religious training and felt free to do that at Dowling.

“But we realized it would be on our own dime,” she said. “And we never once expected the public schools to pick up the tab. In fact, we were specifically avoiding that.”

Since then, though, Celsi said Catholic schools have found out “good school costs money.” When she went to Dowling, she said nuns and priests ran the place and were paid $20,000 a year.

But now they have to pay high salaries as well as benefits to go along with the inflation of other expenses.

Besides, Celsi said even if the “vouchers” (meaning Education Savings Accounts which are different from vouchers) go to private schools, there will still be somewhere between $3,000-$5,000 families have to come up with to afford the difference in the tuition.

“So this notion that, you know, school choice is the taxpayer’s problem – no it’s not,” she said. “My charge as a state senator and this place where I work – the State Capitol – is responsible for public education. If someone else wants to make another choice to go to a different school, you pay for it. That is the deal.

“It’s already existing. It’s been existing for decades. I can’t help it that you can’t meet your budget. That is not my problem and it’s not the problem of 92 percent of Iowans who send their kids to public schools and want their (public) schools to be fully funded. We can’t even manage to fully fund our (public) schools right now. Why on earth are we even considering something like this. It is bogus. It’s a bogus concept.”

Celsi also expressed concern over the private contractors that will be managing the program. She noted billions of dollars in fraud in other states with similar programs. She then said public taxpayers shouldn’t have to fund a tutoring company if parents choose to utilize such a company for their children.

“You want to send your kid to Mathnasium, go ahead, don’t expect the taxpayers to pay up,” she said. “That is not fair.”

Finally, Celsi said she was concerned other things weren’t addressed in the bill for low-income families such as transportation, meals, supplies and uniforms.

“This bill should not be here,” she said. “It is not right. Public money is for public schools, period.”

Author: Jacob Hall

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

4 COMMENTS

  1. It’s not public money! It’s taxpayers money!!!My tax money goes to educate my children how I want. That’s what’s wrong with this country! Too much government! Throw more money at it and gets worse!

  2. Right on Pam. It is tax payers money, too many people forget that. The famlies that get penalized are the famlies that cannot afford options. Sen. Celsius makes no sense.

  3. You know if I was administering a Catholic school I would actually agree with her. I would say hey, all this money you’re talking about is just worthless paper with Caesar’s face on it anyway. I’ll play Caesar’s monetary game, but only with the worthless paper faithful Catholics have detached themselves from by placing it into the collection plate that goes around right before the sacrificial gifts of bread and wine are brought up and consecrated into the Precious and Holy Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ. “Money” that comes to me any other way is blood money I neither want nor need , equal in value to 30 pieces of silver as far as I’m concerned. If you’re concerned about not having enough “money” have you ever considered, The Lord’s Prayer? Asking with humble heart for your daily bread? God, where are all the religious who have taken vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience I can pay even less than $20,000? Who don’t even have the word “IPERS” in their vocabulary? Catholic schools really should waive tuition for anybody who wants to go, have faith in God to make up the difference somewhere – but still, the bill in question is about giving control over the money to the parents. And I’m all for that.

  4. Democrats talk out both sides of their mouths. We have been funding their programs forever. When they want money we have jump up to grab our wallets. Let’s have a real conversation about school superintendent salaries. And money being paid of for political positions for people like equity directors. The DMPS just paid out a huge sum of money for their superintendent who just resigned. You can spend our money any way you want, except on our children. If we choose to take our kids out a public bureaucracy. Then we pay double? How about this, public education should ONLY be paid by people who enroll their kids public schools… Then maybe.. just maybe.. educators will have to find a way to earn their money in a competitive market.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here