***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on grassroots financial supporters to exist. If you appreciate what we do, please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter (even just $5/month would go a long way in sustaining us!) We also offer advertising options for advocacy groups, events and businesses! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News Media” — this is YOUR chance to do something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250 Thank you so much for your support and please invite your friends and family to like us on Facebook, sign up for our email newsletter and visit our website!***

Sixteen states will hold at least one sales tax holiday this year. Is Iowa one of them?

In the midst of the coronavirus crisis, some states are hoping that a sales tax holiday might help restart struggling industries by stimulating the economy. Tennessee, for instance, has created a second sales tax holiday, targeted specifically at food and drink purchases from restaurants.

But states should note that the sudden economic halt was caused by a public health crisis—not a lack of desire for consumer spending.

According to our research, sales tax holidays:

  • Fail to promote economic growth or significantly increase purchases
  • Discriminate arbitrarily among products and across time
  • Can mislead consumers about savings
  • Cause costly complexity and instability for tax code compliance, efficient labor allocation, and inventory management
  • Are not an effective means of relief for low-income consumers

Unfortunately, political gimmicks like sales tax holidays are not real tax cuts and distract from genuine, permanent tax relief. If a state must offer a “holiday” from its tax system, it is an implicit recognition that the state’s tax system is uncompetitive.

Author: Tax Foundation