***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on the financial support of our readers to exist. Please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter at $5, $10/month - whatever you think we're worth! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News” — now YOU can actually DO something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250

The Register’s “What Patients Should Know About Hospital Drug Testing” missed some key information that may help families disrupt the illegal maternal and newborn drug screening practices taking place at Iowa hospitals and clinics.

The Supreme Court ruling in 2001 (Ferguson v. Charleston) made it clear that prenatal drug testing without specific informed consent is unlawful; however, this practice is still happening at some Iowa clinics and hospitals when urine is gathered for testing of urinary tract infections or to check urine glucose or protein levels. Such practices are not only unlawful, but they create mistrust of the medical system which puts the lives of moms and babies at risk.

Regarding newborn drug testing, Iowa code 232.77 states very narrow criteria for drug testing of newborns without parental consent. According to Iowa code, for a newborn to be tested without parental consent a practitioner must document “physical or behavioral symptoms of the effects of exposure to [illicit drugs].” 

Instead of following Iowa code, many Iowa hospitals have implemented their own set of criteria for drug testing newborns without parental consent. Some of these criteria include: If the birthing person has been a victim of domestic violence, does not have custody of one or more children, has had an out-of-hospital birth or free birth, has suffered a placental abruption, has physical attributes of abuse, or has an unassisted birth.

For the Donlin family, a false positive drug test on the umbilical cord led to a distressing eight-month ordeal with Iowa Child Protective Services. Having an unplanned, unassisted home birth is not a demonstration of “physical or behavioral symptoms” of drug use, as required by Iowa law, to justify testing the Donlin newborn without consent, nor is it following the Iowa Neonatal Quality Collaborative Guidelines for newborn assessment.

Iowa hospitals and Iowa Health and Human Services need to get their act together and stop unlawful drug testing of mothers and their newborns. Unlawfully testing for reasons outside of federal law or state code is a violation of civil liberties that harms families, often results in discriminatory practices, and directs taxpayer resources away from the children and families that may actually need support and intervention.

This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Iowa hospitals must stop unlawful drug testing after births.

Author: Rachel Bruns

Rachel Bruns is a maternal-child health advocate and serves as a volunteer chapter leader for the International Cesarean Awareness Network (ICAN) of Central Iowa and patient advisor on the Iowa Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Rachel works for a national nonprofit association promoting national service and volunteering. She lives in Des Moines with her partner Jordan and two children.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here