[adrotate group="5"]
Home Opinion SHORT: Iowa House Dems don’t trust 16- and 17-year-olds to watch school-aged...

SHORT: Iowa House Dems don’t trust 16- and 17-year-olds to watch school-aged kids, but would they let them change genders?

Americans For Prosperity looking for a passionate advocate for liberty to join our team as a Grassroots Engagement Director. You will identify, recruit, and lead volunteers in voter-contact activity as our activist base holds our elected officials accountable. There are multiple opportunities across Iowa with one of the largest and established grassroots efforts in the nation. For these permanent field staff positions we offer an industry leading benefits package, flexible work schedule, and the opportunity to make meaningful public policy change. We Have Grassroots Engagement Director Openings In: • Iowa – Cedar Rapids • Iowa – Des Moines Please feel free to apply today or contact a recruiter to discuss more options by booking a call with a recruiter here (Be sure to mention you heard about this opportunity through the Iowa Standard). Looking for something different? Check out other opportunities at AFP here.
***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on the financial support of our readers to exist. Please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter at $5, $10/month - whatever you think we're worth! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News” — now YOU can actually DO something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at newsdesk@theiowastandard.com or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250

One of the bills I watched the Iowa House debate was House File 2198. It allows 16- and 17-year-olds to provide child care in a center for school-aged children without supervision.

As noted, 16-year-olds can be lifeguards and they can be CNAs, but they can’t work in a child care center without direct supervision from an adult.

Democrats discussed at length the idea that 16- and 17-year-olds may not be responsible enough to provide child care without adult supervision.

This is ironic because many — if not all — of those same Democrats would likely be fully supportive of those teens deciding they’re in the “wrong body” and allow them to undergo gender reassignment surgery.

I mean, are they really willing to suggest that 16- and 17-year-olds may not be entirely trustworthy or responsible or mature enough to care for school-aged kids but are totally trustworthy, responsible and mature enough to decide to receive permanent, life-alftering, gender-reassignment treatment? 

For the record, the bill passed 55-43. Democrat Rep. Kristin Sunde voted for the measure. Republican Representatives Megan Jones, Dustin Hite, Charlie McClintock, Jon Dunwell and Sandy Salmon voted against it.

Author: Jacob Hall

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version