***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on the financial support of our readers to exist. Please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter at $5, $10/month - whatever you think we're worth! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News” — now YOU can actually DO something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250

Attorneys for First Liberty Institute urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Wednesday to reverse a lower court decision that allowed Philadelphia District Attorney Lawrence Krasner to terminate the employment of Assistant District Attorney Rachel Spivack for refusing to receive the COVID-19 vaccination after she submitted a religious accommodation request. Spivack’s Orthodox Jewish faith prohibits her from receiving vaccinations.

“Religious liberty should not depend on union membership,” said Lea Patterson, Senior Counsel for First Liberty, who argued the case. “The District Attorney disregarded the law by treating those like Rachel who requested religious accommodation less favorably than those who requested accommodation for other reasons. As the Supreme Court has already made clear, the government is not free to disregard the First Amendment’s protection of religious liberty in times of crisis.”

Rachel Spivack served as an assistant district attorney in Philadelphia District Attorney Lawrence Krasner’s office. When Krasner’s office mandated the COVID-19 vaccine, she requested a religious accommodation because her Orthodox Jewish religious beliefs prohibit her from receiving any vaccines. After waiting for almost seven months for a response to her accommodation request, her request was denied and she was fired, while ten unionized employees and one medically exempt non-unionized employee were permitted to continue working without being vaccinated. Krasner denied all religious exemption or accommodation requests because he believed he was not legally required to grant them, even though he allowed others to work in the office unvaccinated.

Attorneys for Spivack urged the appeals court to reverse the lower court’s decision to grant summary judgment for the Defendant.

Author: Press Release

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here