***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on the financial support of our readers to exist. Please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter at $5, $10/month - whatever you think we're worth! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News” — now YOU can actually DO something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through its Office for Civil Rights, yesterday released a proposed regulation that will force health insurance companies to cover expensive transgender surgeries and treatments, as well as require doctors to perform these procedures, including on minors, over their sincere and consistent medical objections.

Roger Severino, vice president of domestic policy at The Heritage Foundation and former director of HHS’ Office for Civil Rights, released the following statement Tuesday on the proposed rule:


“Our health care system should be focused on helping Americans of all ages get the best care and treatment, not advancing a narrow transgender agenda that replaces the hard facts of medicine with woke ideology. In attempting to address phantom problems, the proposal will inflict real harm on patients and providers. By imposing an unscientific gender standard of care, and requiring insurance plans to pay for it, the rule will result in sterilization, loss of sexual function, removal of healthy reproductive organs, and a plethora of unnecessary surgeries and chemical interventions with life-long consequences.

“Given appointments to HHS like transgender activist Dr. Rachel Levine and abortion radical Secretary Xavier Becerra, this transgender mandate is not surprising. On the heels of the Biden administration’s plans to require girls and women to share school lockers, showers, dorms, and sports with men and boys, this erasure of women from medicine and health will be the next domino to fall if it is not resisted.

“The proposed rule is littered with woke jargon such as ‘pregnant person,’ ‘respondents who retained a uterus,’ ‘individual who does not have a cervix,’ and ‘individual who does not have a prostate,’ which is demeaning to both men and women.

“What’s truly alarming about this rule is how it irresponsibly pushes transgender treatments despite no legal requirement to and in the face of faulty and contradicting evidence. Neither law, policy, nor science support such an extreme inversion of medicine, which is why the HHS should abandon all efforts to amend the Section 1557 rule.”

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here