Sen. Ernst Questions Supreme Court Nominee Judge Barrett at Judiciary Committee Hearing

***The Iowa Standard is an independent media voice. We rely on grassroots financial supporters to exist. If you appreciate what we do, please consider a one-time sign of support or becoming a monthly supporter (even just $5/month would go a long way in sustaining us!) We also offer advertising options for advocacy groups, events and businesses! If you’ve ever used the phrase “Fake News Media” — this is YOUR chance to do something about it! You can also support us on PayPal at [email protected] or Venmo at Iowa-Standard-2018 or through the mail at: PO Box 112 Sioux Center, IA 51250 Thank you so much for your support and please invite your friends and family to like us on Facebook, sign up for our email newsletter and visit our website!***

U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA), one of the first female Republicans to serve on the Senate Judiciary Committee, questioned Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s nominee to be the next Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court, at Tuesday’s committee hearing.

First Amendment

Ernst introduced for the record a coalition letter from 66 pro-life organizations—representing a range of groups from Susan B. Anthony List to Secular Pro-Life—that have expressed their support for Judge Barrett as a “jurist who rightly leaves politics to politicians and legislating to legislators.”

The senator asked Judge Barrett about how she relied on controlling precedent in her ruling of Price v. City of Chicago, a case about “buffer zone” ordinances around abortion facilities.

Waters of the United States (WOTUS) Rule and Ethanol

Ernst asked Judge Barrett to share her views on federal agency rulemaking, noting the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule. The senator also questioned Judge Barrett about the 10th Circuit’s decision in Renewable Fuels Association v. EPA regarding small refinery exemptions and how agencies should interpret the laws passed by Congress.