Settled law does not make a thing constitutional. More so when it is premised on erroneous "science". And once upon a time Dred Scott was settled law, premised on a man having the right to treat another man as property and said man having no right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Likewise, a human at the moment of conception has an inalienable right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Do better Joni; settled law does not trump common law, nor the Constitution.
At this point, Hardin county voters need to start a write in campaign, to deny the election to the lying RINO on their ballot, and elect the second place candidate. Lest they wake up one morning next Spring with bulldozers lined up at their property line to steal their land for Ratsetter' benefit.
Lee Co Board of Supervisors: “We respectfully request that the Iowa Utilities Board consider the principles set forth in Iowa Code 6A.21. Portions of this code clearly demonstrate the protection of agricultural lands from private development. Unlike natural gas pipelines or fuel pipelines, CO2 pipelines serve no public purpose. The precedent set by granting of eminent domain to projects like this would mean that eminent domain could be used for any number of projects for which it was never intended.” This is commendable of the BOS to take a stand for their people. However, I would contend that Rights trump...
Unacceptable trial results by any normal practice. Covid19 vax are the exception, as if Big Pharma and Medicine is desperate to push it on everyone everywhere. Nürnberg 2.0 level crimes against humanity for them and their legislative enablers.
When most of the language in the proposed Senate bill is unconstitutional, it should be flat out rejected. But that's not the criteria Grassley goes by. He goes by ambiguous "common sense" which ignores common law and inalienable rights. But he's safe for now, having "won" the primary without having to debate Jim Carlin and exposing his weaknesses.
What about your role in the disaster? You had a chance to back Trump for 4 years and did nothing to effect a closure of the border. And now Biden is your scapegoat? Turn that mirror around 180 degrees, sir.
Hmmm. Since "conservatives" can't seem to reconcile the fact that ethanol fuels is a boondoggle; looks like it's going to take a globalist to kill it. Thus sparing the RINOs the agony of admitting that the science and economics of RFS is fake. Here's a challenge to the RINOs promoting E85 as energy efficient. Take a 1 or 2 gal fuel container of regular (10% ethanol) and fill up your car with E85. Record the odometer and drive the car until it starts to sputter. Record the odometer, then pour the regular into the car, drive to nearest gas station...
At the rate Biden is going, he'll need 5 years to overtake what Trump accomplished in 4. Good luck with that starting next year when we take back majority in both houses. But I should caveat that... No telling to what extent DIABLOs - Demonrat In All But Label Only - will all join hands around his waist to lift him up and over the 4 year record.